Explained - Ramleela In Trinidad: A Cultural Thread To India That Refused To Die Down

How a centuries-old theatrical tradition survived oceans, colonial brutality, and changing times to become the beating heart of Indianness in Trinidad and Tobago.

When Prime Minister Narendra Modi called Lord Ram“the divine link beyond oceans” during his address in Trinidad on July 3, it wasn't mere diplomacy. For close to two centuries, Ramleela - the retelling of the Ramcharitmanas has served as an emotional and cultural lifeline for Indian-origin communities in Trinidad and Tobago.

This Caribbean island nation, with a population of around 13 lakh, is nearly half Indian in origin. Their ancestors arrived as labourers between 1845 and 1917, carrying little with them except their faith, language, and the stories of Shri Ram. Over time, Ramleela would grow into more than just a religious play. It became a mirror of identity, a social cohesion, and a ritual of remembrance.

After slavery was abolished in the British Empire in 1834, former colonies like Trinidad faced a labour vacuum, especially on their sugar plantations. To plug this gap, British colonial agents began recruiting labour from India, largely from the present-day states of Bihar and Uttar Pradesh.

Though advertised as an opportunity, the servitude was harsh. Wages were docked, contracts were binding, and working conditions were punishing. These labourers, called girmitiyas, endured loneliness, exploitation, and forced cultural exile.

But they carried something sacred with them: the Ramcharitmanas. Whether through memorised verses or tattered copies, the story of Shri Ram travelled across the seas. And in their new land, far from Ayodhya or the ghats of the Ganga, they revived it, through Ramleela.

In the villages of Trinidad's countryside, where Bhojpuri songs filled the air and rotis on open flames, Ramleela became a community event. Everyone had a role to play from elders, trained new actors, carpenters built effigies, women prepared food, and families gathered each night to watch the story unfold.

Paula Richman, in her 2010 paper 'Ramlila in Trinidad', described how these productions, despite the lack of formal resources, thrived on collective effort and emotional memory. For many, this was the only way to feel connected to a home they had never seen.

By the late 19th century, Ramleela's hold began to slip. English education reduced the use of Bhojpuri, and newer generations found themselves less emotionally attached to Tulsidas's verses. Migration to cities further reduced old community bonds.

But the decline wasn't absolute. Instead of dying out, Ramleela adapted. Caste and gender restrictions were relaxed. Scripts were made simpler. Visual storytelling became better. Performance styles evolved to suit modern tastes while keeping the original essence alive.

And with Indian-origin Trinidadians rising in political and economic ranks, cultural pride found fresh fuel. Ramleela returned, no longer just as a relic of the past, but a vibrant part of Trinidad's cultural present.

Despite its transformations, the backbone of Trinidad's Ramleela remains unchanged. The Ramcharitmanas still shapes the dialogue, themes, and teachings of every performance. Even when audience members can't fully understand the language, the moral force of the story remains intact.

Richman observed that whether they knew Hindi or not, Trinidadians attending Ramleela still absorbed its spiritual messages. It continued to teach, inspire, and unite steadily.

Over time, Ramleela in Trinidad has become a ritual of belonging. A way to stay Indian, while becoming Trinidadian. A story carried across oceans that refused to be forgotten.

MENAFN05072025007385015968ID1109762985