How US Could Use Pipelines, Russian Assets To Tame EU

While control over the Kiev-owned Ukrainian pipeline could be obtained via Trump's proposed resource deal with Ukraine, which might require forcing Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to form a government of national unity if he doesn't agree to this on his own, different means would be needed for the Russian-owned Nord Streams.

Hypothetically returning the estimated US$5 billion of seized Russian assets under American jurisdiction wouldn't suffice for replacing the nearly $20 billion that Nord Stream 1 and 2 cost in total.

The additional $15 billion (or more if Russia demands such and the US agrees) could be obtained by pressuring the EU into releasing that amount of seized Russian assets under its jurisdiction.

If the EU refuses, then Russia and the US could agree to a creative financial arrangement whereby Russia transfers legal ownership of this sum to the US, the US transfers this same amount to Russia, and then Trump weaponizes the $15 billion of newly US-owned assets under EU jurisdiction as a chip in their trade war.

This formula for handling Moscow's seized assets could also be utilized for facilitating Russia's reported requested purchase of US-made Boeing jets, which a Bloomberg source said it would consider if and when a Ukraine ceasefire is in place.

Taken to its extreme, the estimated $300 billion worth of assets that the West seized from Russia over the Ukraine war could be transferred to the US via these means for large-scale purchases across a range of industries that would conceivably solidify the two sides' strategic economic partnership in a post-conflict era.

Along those lines, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt recently said ,“There is an incentive for Russia to end this war and perhaps that could be economic partnerships with the United States.”

Sign up for one of our free newsletters

• The Daily Report Start your day right with Asia Times' top stories
• AT Weekly Report A weekly roundup of Asia Times' most-read stories

Russia has survived the war without those seized assets and doesn't expect them to be returned in full, perhaps not even at all, despite official rhetoric to the contrary. That is why this would potentially be the most mutually beneficial use of them in the context of the nascent Russian –US “New Detente .”

This creative financial diplomacy would also give the US considerable new leverage over the EU. US control over most Russian pipeline gas imports would incentivize the EU into concessions on their trade war.

At the same time, whatever seized Russian assets the US obtains legal ownership of from Moscow could serve to justify ramping up pressure on the bloc in this same context.

This article was first published on Andrew Korybko's Substack and is republished with kind permission. Become an Andrew Korybko Newsletter subscriber here.

Sign up here to comment on Asia Times stories Or Sign in to an existing accoun

Thank you for registering!

An account was already registered with this email. Please check your inbox for an authentication link.

• Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
• Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
• Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
• Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
• Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
• Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
• Click to print (Opens in new window) Print