Tuesday, 02 January 2024 12:17 GMT

New Delhi Railway Station Stampede: Was Railways Act Flouted? Delhi HC Asks 'Why Number Of Tickets Sold Exceed...'


(MENAFN- Live Mint) The Delhi High Court on Wednesday sought a response from the Railways regarding a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) over the recent stampede incident at the New Delhi Railway Station. Eighteen people had died in the incident that took place on February 15.

What did the plea say?

The court noted that this public interest petition raised concerns about the ineffective implementation of provisions in the Railways Act, primarily Sections 57 and 147.

According to news agency ANI, the PIL alleged that the stampede on Platform No. 16 was caused by overcrowding due to multiple long-distance trains arriving and departing simultaneously on the Delhi-Prayagraj route during the Mahakumbh 2025.

It reportedly claimed that the tragedy was a result of administrative negligence and violated the fundamental right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution.

What did the court say? 'Why number of tickets sold exceed...'

During the hearing of the PIL, the Division Bench of Chief Justice DK Upadhyay and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela questioned the Railways for selling tickets in excess of the number of passengers that can be accommodated in a coach, Bar and Bench reported.

"If you fix the number of passengers to be accommodated in a coach then why do you sell, why the number of tickets sold exceed that number ? That is a problem," the court was quoted as saying.

The court referred to Section 57 of the Railways Act.

"If you implement a simple thing in a positive manner in letter and spirit, such situation can be avoided. On rush days you may increase that number to accommodate. The rush depending on exigencies which keep on arriving from time to time. But not fixing the strength to be accommodated in a coach, this provision appears to have been neglected all along," the court remarked, according to Bar and Bench

MENAFN19022025007365015876ID1109224557


Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.

Search