
Why EU May Seize Russia's 'Shadow Fleet' In The Baltic
They might also pass new national laws to legitimize this too. Finland's seizure of one such ship last December on the pretext that it was involved in cutting an underwater cable allegedly inspired them to consider doing so regularly. The purpose would be to slash the Kremlin's foreign revenue flow from sales of discounted oil to Asia.
Around 40% of its“shadow fleet” transits through the Baltic Sea, amounting to a little less than 350 vessels whose total business was roughly equivalent to around one-third of Russia's annual defense budget, so stopping them from operating there could deal a powerful financial blow to the Kremlin.
There are several challenges inherent in these plans which make them a lot more difficult to pull off than policymakers might think, however, and were touched upon in Politico's report.
First of all, international law and third countries' ownership of some“shadow fleet” vessels mean that hefty political and legal costs might follow the seizure of even a single ship, something that Finland is only just now discovering after December's dramatic incident.
These consequences might result in them rethinking the wisdom of seizing any more ships, especially if they can't count on the EU as a whole to back them up, let alone NATO's American leader.
The last-mentioned concern segues into the second point about the risk of escalation in the event that Russia dispatches naval convoys to escort its“shadow fleet” through the Baltic.

Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.
Comments
No comment