Switzerland And EU Want To Negotiate, But Optimism Is Limited

(MENAFN- Swissinfo) It's taken three years, 11 exploratory rounds and 46 specialised meetings, but the official negotiations on the future relationship between Bern and Brussels have finally begun. Here's what you need to know.

Where does Switzerland stand? Where is it heading? Its developments are my focus.

• More from this author
• German Department

• Deutsch de Die Schweiz und die EU wollen verhandeln – die Aufbruchstimmung hält sich in Grenzen Original Read more: Die Schweiz und die EU wollen verhandeln – die Aufbruchstimmung hält sich in Grenzen
• Français fr La Suisse et l'UE commencent à négocier sans grand enthousiasme Read more: La Suisse et l'UE commencent à négocier sans grand enthousiasme
• Italiano it Svizzera e UE lanciano i negoziati, ma l'ottimismo non abbonda Read more: Svizzera e UE lanciano i negoziati, ma l'ottimismo non abbonda

The smoke signals are set: on March 8 the Swiss government adopted the mandateExternal link for the negotiations with the EU, and a few days later the EU also gave the green light. This clears the way for a new agreement on future relations.

On the one side, neutral Switzerland, endeavouring to maintain political independence and interested in international trade; on the other is the European Union, the largest economic area in the world, which is becoming ever deeper politically and will presumably continue to grow.

This content was published on Mar 18, 2024 Swiss President Viola Amherd travelled to Brussels to meet EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen to continue work on a bilateral agreement.

Switzerland's access to the European single market has so far been regulated by a large number of bilateral agreements. The government's declared aim is to stabilise and expand this bilateral approach. This is in response to pressure from the EU, which wants to update the relationship with Switzerland – the current form of which has remained the same since the 1990s. This involves updating existing agreements on the one hand and concluding new agreements in the areas of electricity, health and food safety on the other.

Major sticking points are the dynamic adoption of future changes to EU law, the free movement of people (where Switzerland wants to secure certain exceptions), and wage protection. The issue of dispute resolution and the role of the European Court of Justice in this are also generating debate.

At the moment, two camps are clearly recognisable: the right-wing Swiss People's Party is in total opposition and speaks of a“treaty of subjugation”. The party has been cultivating an anti-EU stance since the 1990s and has become the party with the largest share of the vote as a result. They are currently the only party with a clear political message.

The other parties are signalling agreement in principle, although practically all of them are keeping their distance – they don't want to get too far out on a limb. This is also a constant in Swiss-European relations: despite the close proximity, criticism is always louder than agreement. Depending on the content of the negotiations, a different part of the negotiating package is criticised.

The majority of civil society can also be found in this second camp. Business and employers' associations, for example, emphasise the possibility of strengthening legal certainty and Switzerland as a business location with stable bilateral relations. The greatest extra-parliamentary criticism comes from trade unions, which fear a deterioration in wage protection and consider the mandate to be unsuitable in this respect.

In contrast to the institutional framework agreement, which Switzerland unilaterally walked away from in 2021, the situation is better today, says Swiss public television, SRF. However, there is still“little optimism”.

Some opinion pieces criticise the reluctance of political parties and civil society, for example in the Swiss edition of Die Zeit, which says people must“finally recognise the European question for what it is: a decision about the big picture” – and mobilise accordingly.

However, it remains unclear how this should be done. The SonntagsBlick writes that the government urgently needs a“grounded Mr or Ms Europe”: someone who stands out from the elitist political class and can authentically convey the urgency of the population's concerns.

However, it is questionable whether a single person can do this. In any case, the French-speaking Swiss newspaper Le Temps believes that the seven-member government has a duty to express itself“broadly, quickly and decisively”. However, the right-wing spectrum is not satisfied with the government's approach. The SonntagsZeitung, for example, writes that this is“European political suicide”.

European media, on the other hand, barely cover the issue. This is not surprising, as even the EU's reaction was anything but exuberant. As the Neue Zürcher Zeitung points out, the EU has“greater concerns than the difficult relationship with Switzerland”.

The EU would like to reach a swift conclusion. This is because the European elections will take place in June, after which a new Commission will be elected. It is unclear how realistic the goal of concluding the negotiations before then is. Especially as the Swiss government has signalled at home that it will demand improvements from the EU on some points. European officials have expressed similar sentiments: should Switzerland demand more, they would do the same.

The Swiss government has already clarified the position of parliament, cantons, associations and social and economic partners in a consultation process. It has stated that“the vast majority” support the existing basis. However, in Switzerland's direct democracy with its constantly changing alliances, there are no absolute and stable loyalties. And the issue of the EU has all too often caused considerable political upheaval in recent decades.

A corresponding referendum is expected in 2026 at the earliest. In this respect at least, there is unanimity in Switzerland: the outcome is completely open.

Edited by Marc Leutenegger. Translated from German by DeepL/ts

Do you want to read our weekly top stories? Subscribe
here .

• Switzerland renegotiates with the EU after almost three years

In compliance with the JTI standards

More: SWI swissinfo certified by the Journalism Trust Initiative

You can find an overview of ongoing debates with our journalists here . Please join us!

If you want to start a conversation about a topic raised in this article or want to report factual errors, email us at ... .

This content was published on Nov 6, 2023 Bern and Brussels had come to a tacit agreement to clarify their complicated relationship after the Swiss federal elections. What's the situation now?

This content was published on Jan 17, 2023 The EU wants to govern relations with Switzerland with a packet of sectoral accords, but Switzerland is dragging its feet.

This content was published on Mar 4, 2022 From money to direct democracy: we look at some of the main reasons behind Switzerland's decision not to join the 27-nation bloc.

MENAFN18032024000210011054ID1107993297

Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.