Wednesday, 07 June 2023 06:18 GMT

How Big Tech Camouflaged Wall Street's Crisis


(MENAFN- Khaleej Times) The fate of the S&P 500 index - used by investors as a barometer for the health of corporate America, and cited by presidents as a measure of their handling of the economy - often comes down to just two companies: Apple and Microsoft.

This means it's hard to invest in the US stock market, such as through a 401(k) or pension plan, and not be highly dependent on the fate of the two tech giants. More than $15 trillion in assets, from pension funds and endowments to insurance companies, are linked to the performance of the S&P 500 index in some way, according to S&P Dow Jones Indices, with more than 10 cents of every dollar allocated to the broad index flowing through to Microsoft's and Apple's market valuation.

It is a phenomenon explained by how the benchmark is constructed, and it is amplified by the way tech has come to dwarf other industries, in the markets and the economy. And it means that the two companies together can sway the direction of the broad market, sometimes masking turmoil that has taken place underneath.

Trading in March offers a clear example. Even after the failures of two regional banks in the United States and the rescue of a global investment bank in Europe sent a jolt through the financial system and raised new fears about an already fragile global economy, the S&P 500 ended the month up 3.5%.

Apple and Microsoft accounted for more than half of that gain, according to data from S&P. Both were seemingly immune to the banking crisis and boosted by fervour over artificial intelligence, with Apple rising 11.4% during the month and Microsoft 15.6%.

It can be jarring for investors to see the index perform so differently from what they may have predicted, said Fiona Cincotta, a stock market analyst at StoneX, a brokerage.

“It's phenomenal that two companies can direct so much power within the S&P 500,” she said.“These two companies seem to have been single-handedly directing the index.”

It was true even at the height of the frenzy. On Monday, March 13, immediately after the government seized Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank, signs of panic were everywhere: Several regional banks suffered their worst day ever in the stock market, with First Republic Bank down more than 60 per cent, in conditions so chaotic that trading in many individual stocks was halted as stock exchanges tried to limit the damage.

Outside the stock market, government bond yields went haywire, oil prices slid and the dollar weakened, all showing that alarms about the economy were ringing on trading desks around the world.

Yet the S&P 500 spent much of the day in positive territory, and it ended with a barely noticeable decline of 0.1%. Credit, again, goes to Microsoft and Apple, which both rose enough to counter a 15% slide in the entire regional banking sector that day.

Much of this comes down to how the S&P 500 is designed. Its value is calculated by a measure that considers the overall market capitalisation of a company. It means the stock moves of the largest companies carry the greatest weight, because even slight changes in their value create or destroy billions of dollars of shareholder value.

Apple, at roughly $2.4 trillion, and Microsoft, at $2.1 trillion, are so large that, taken together, the two companies would be the third-largest sector of the index, behind tech and health care. They would be larger than the energy sector and roughly the size of the financials sector.

This dynamic is not wholly unusual in the history of the S&P 500, though it is extreme, and it has been exacerbated by the rapid growth of some tech companies through the pandemic. (At the end of 2018, Microsoft's and Apple's combined index weight was less than Apple's today on its own.) The previous company to reach Microsoft's 6.2% weight in the index was IBM in the mid-80s, based on data for the end of each calendar year.

“I don't think it's a problem,” said Howard Silverblatt, senior index analyst at S&P Dow Jones Indices.“This is what the whole thing is worth, and if Apple or Microsoft go up or down, there is proportional impact because they are worth more. It's market-driven.”

The S&P also produces an“equal weight” index, where each stock has the same effect on the wider group. In March, that index is down 3%.

Another commonly cited measure of Wall Street's performance, the Dow Jones industrial average is a price-weighted index that has been criticised for how it emphasizes companies based on their share price alone.

And then there are the underlying sectors, which are also tracked in separate indexes by S&P. These indexes, which tend to more directly show pain afflicting their subsets of stocks, show that the financial sector fell almost 10% in March, while energy stocks dropped 0.5% and real estate companies slid 2.1%. They also show that other parts of the market - like utilities - fared just fine.

“There were so many sectors that underperformed and were in the red across the month, and that was completely pushed over and overshadowed by the gains in big tech,” Cincotta said.

For now, analysts see reasons for tech to continue to rally.

One reason is the excitement over artificial intelligence. Microsoft has a large stake in OpenAI, the creator of ChatGPT, and many investors foresee the nascent technology driving the next phase of growth for the companies developing the software as well as the chip makers whose processors power it.

Tech stocks are also benefiting from the concern over the country's banks, which has led investors to quickly cut back their expectation for interest rate increases from the Federal Reserve. The sector is particularly sensitive to interest rates, and absent an imminent recession, lower rates in the future would be a boost for the sector.

And, analysts said, large technology companies have become havens where investors can wait out the current storm.

“It's been a big bull cycle for tech,” said George Catrambone, the head of Americas trading at DWS, a fund manager.“I don't think people will give up that paradigm easily.”

This article originally appeared in The New York Times

MENAFN01042023000049011007ID1105927572


Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.