Bank ABC Jordan – Ratings Affirmed with a Stable Outlook| MENAFN.COM

Thursday, 08 December 2022 02:01 GMT

Bank ABC Jordan – Ratings Affirmed with a Stable Outlook


(MENAFN- Capital Intelligence Ltd) Capital Intelligence Ratings (CI Ratings or CI) today announced that it has affirmed the Long-Term Foreign Currency Rating (LT FCR) and Short-Term Foreign Currency Rating (ST FCR) of Arab Banking Corporation Jordan (Bank ABC) at ‘B+’ and ‘B’, respectively. At the same time, CI Ratings has affirmed Bank ABC’s Bank Standalone Rating (BSR) of ‘b+’, Core Financial Strength (CFS) rating of ‘bb+’, and Extraordinary Support Level (ESL) of High. The Outlook for the LT FCR and BSR is Stable.

CI’s ESL assessment does not result in any uplift for the LT FCR because the BSR is already at the sovereign level, and the Bank does not fulfil our criteria for being rated above Jordan’s ratings. Nevertheless, the likelihood of extraordinary support in the event of need is deemed to be high in view of the Bank’s strong ownership and the high probability of support from Bahrain-based parent, Bank ABC, in the event of need. While CI believes the willingness of the government to provide support remains high, its financial capacity is considered moderate as indicated by Jordan’s sovereign ratings (‘B+’/‘B’/Stable).

The Bank’s FCRs remain constrained by the ratings assigned to the sovereign, reflecting its base of operations in Jordan. The BSR is based on a CFS rating of ‘bb+’ and an Operating Environment Risk Anchor (OPERA) of ‘b+’ (indicating high risk), and is also constrained by the Bank’s limited capacity to withstand sovereign-related stress. OPERA takes into account both current and projected economic and financial conditions in Jordan, as well as the strengths and weaknesses of the banking sector. In particular, our OPERA assessment reflects sluggish economic growth dynamics in Jordan, the economy’s high reliance on capital inflows to cover the chronic current account deficit, low monetary flexibility and substantial regional instability risks. On a positive note, it also takes into account the fact that the Jordanian banking sector exhibits very sound capital and liquidity buffers and has shown strong resilience amid the challenging operating environment in recent years.

The ratings are supported by the Bank’s solid capitalisation, more than full loan loss reserve (LLR) coverage of NPLs, and comfortable liquidity despite the recent tightening of some key loan-based ratios. The ratings are constrained by the Bank’s small size and relatively limited market share, and resultant high concentrations in both the loan book and the customer deposit base. These factors elevate credit and liquidity risks, respectively. Loan asset quality suffered a setback in H1 22 and, as a result, net profitability weakened due to stepped up provision charges. Operating profitability also declined significantly due to lower operating income generation. The ratings are also constrained by the very high concentration in Jordanian government paper and the challenging operating environment in Jordan, aggravated by the effects of the Ukrainian war on the local economy.

Bank ABC ranks among the smaller-sized banks in terms of assets and customer deposits in the Jordanian domestic banking sector, resulting in high concentrations on both sides of the balance sheet. However, it is a prudent and well-managed institution and this has enabled it to weather the ongoing economic slowdown in Jordan (better than many of its peers). The Bank’s overall satisfactory financial profile evidences conservative risk management practices developed in tandem with its supportive parent. Despite a setback in loan asset quality and profitability in recent years, the Bank continues to exhibit satisfactory and, in some areas, very sound key financial indicators.

CI considers Bank ABC’s asset quality to be satisfactory as indicated by the more than full LLR coverage together with moderate level of stage 2 loans. Nevertheless, the NPL ratio increased again to 7.8% in H1 22 – a level above the sector average of 5.5% – after the classification of a large borrower in the manufacturing sector. In response, management stepped up impairment charges significantly, maintaining more than full LLR cover. Management has informed CI that if the three largest (almost fully provisioned) NPLs were to be transferred off the balance sheet, the NPL ratio would decrease to a relatively low 4.8%, while LLR cover would strengthen to 112%, based on H1 22 figures. In view of the challenging operating environment, further NPL growth is not to be ruled out in the near term, particularly given that the Central Bank of Jordan’s (CBJ) forbearance measures expired at end-2021. The steps taken by the CBJ, including relaxing lending and restructuring criteria (as well as granting repayment holidays to all borrowers for affected sectors) are likely to have masked asset quality erosion in the banking system. In mitigation, the Bank’s loss absorption capacity is sound, reflecting strong LLR cover and a solid CAR. Asset quality continues to be impacted by the high concentration to individual borrowers, which in turn aggravates credit risk. This has indeed been a source of high NPL accretion in recent years. Similarly, concentration in low-rated Jordanian government securities is high and equivalent to almost double the Bank’s equity, although this is a common occurrence observed at almost all local banks.

Operating profitability weakened significantly in H1 22, hampered by lower net interest income (NII), and a decline in non-interest income (non-II; mainly fees and commissions). The former decreased moderately as a result of higher suspended interest on new classified loans, together with pressure on net interest margin (NIM). Consequently, at an annualised 1.0% of average total assets (ATA) the Bank’s loss absorption capacity is now considered merely adequate. At the net level, profitability also decreased to a low level, dragged down by the 32% decrease in operating profit and elevated loan loss impairments. CI expects ROAA to remain under pressure due to high provision charges as further growth in NPLs cannot to be ruled out.

Although the loan to deposit ratio tightened in 2021 and H1 22 as loan expansion surpassed customer deposit growth, the net loans to stable funds ratio remained very sound, reflecting Bank ABC’s solid capitalisation. Reliance on wholesale funding is relatively high in view of the Bank’s comparatively small franchise – the latter also produces high depositor concentration. Liquidity ratios however remain very comfortable, reflecting a large stock of liquid assets – a vast majority of which comprises Jordanian government securities. While the latter are not traded in an active market, they are repoable with the CBJ and other local banks and constitute an important part of liquidity. Bank ABC also continues to benefit from access to funding from its parent bank in Bahrain and other affiliated entities, and at rather competitive rates. While utilisation of such funding has decreased considerably in recent years, the availability of such lines provides a good buffer in times of stressed liquidity.

Bank ABC’s capital position remains solid with this factor firmly supporting the ratings. The Bank’s CAR, which is one of the sector highest and consists almost entirely of loss-absorbing CET 1, provides a good buffer against any unexpected losses, particularly in view of the challenging economic environment and prevalent high credit risk. Capital adequacy also benefits from the low risk weight assigned to the relatively high proportion of consumer loans, including residential mortgages. Capital flexibility is good, underpinned by the willingness and capacity of the parent to support Bank ABC in case of distress. While the rate of internally generated capital recovered in 2021, CI expects it to remain at best moderate in the short term in light of the weakened profitability in H1 22.

Rating Outlook

The Stable Outlook indicates that the ratings are unlikely to change over the next 12 months. It also reflects our expectation that the Bank will maintain its currently very sound liquidity and capital buffers.

Rating Dynamics: Upside Scenario

For the LT FCR to rise by one notch, Jordan’s sovereign ratings would have to improve. Such an improvement is not likely in the short term.

Rating Dynamics: Downside Scenario

Although not our current expectation, a downgrade of Jordan’s sovereign ratings would have a corresponding effect on the Bank’s LT FCR and BSR. The Bank’s CFS could be lowered if loan asset quality deteriorates further, which in turn would put pressure on profitability through elevated provision charges. A further decline in both operating and net profit would also result in a downgrade of the CFS.

Contact

Primary Analyst: George Panayides, Senior Credit Analyst; E-mail: george.panayides@ciratings.com
Secondary Analyst & Committee Chairperson: Morris Helal, Senior Credit Analyst

About the Ratings

The credit ratings have been issued by Capital Intelligence Ratings Ltd, P.O. Box 53585, Limassol 3303, Cyprus.

The following information sources were used to prepare the credit ratings: public information and information provided by the rated entity. Financial data and metrics have been derived by CI from the rated entity’s financial statements for FY18-2021 and H1 22. CI may also have relied upon non-public financial information provided by the rated entity and may also have used financial information from credible, independent third-party data providers. CI considers the quality of information available on the rated entity to be satisfactory for the purposes of assigning and maintaining credit ratings. CI does not audit or independently verify information received during the rating process.

The principal methodology used to determine the ratings is the Bank Rating Methodology, dated 3 April 2019 (see Information on rating scales and definitions, the time horizon of rating outlooks, and the definition of default can be found at Historical performance data, including default rates, are available from a central repository established by ESMA (CEREP) at

This rating action follows a scheduled periodic (annual) review of the rated entity. Ratings on the entity were first released in February 1998. The ratings were last updated in November 2021. The ratings and rating outlook were disclosed to the rated entity prior to publication and were not amended following that disclosure. The ratings have been assigned or maintained at the request of the rated entity or a related third party.

Conditions of Use and General Limitations

The information contained in this publication including opinions, views, data, material and ratings may not be copied, distributed, altered or otherwise reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form or manner by any person except with the prior written consent of Capital Intelligence Ratings Ltd (hereinafter “CI”). All information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be accurate and reliable. However, because of the possibility of human or mechanical error or other factors by third parties, CI or others, the information is provided “as is” and CI and any third-party providers make no representations, guarantees or warranties whether express or implied regarding the accuracy or completeness of this information.

Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing, CI and any third-party providers accept no responsibility or liability for any losses, errors or omissions, however caused, or for the results obtained from the use of this information. CI and any third-party providers do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damages, costs, expenses, legal fees or losses or any indirect or consequential loss or damage including, without limitation, loss of business and loss of profits, as a direct or indirect consequence of or in connection with or resulting from any use of this information.

Credit ratings and credit-related analysis issued by CI are current opinions as of the date of publication and not statements of fact. CI’s credit ratings provide a relative ranking of credit risk. They do not indicate a specific probability of default over any given time period. The ratings do not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, including, but not limited to, market risk and liquidity risk. CI’s ratings are not a recommendation to purchase, sell, or hold any security and do not comment as to market price or suitability of any security for a particular investor.

The information contained in this publication does not constitute investment or financial advice. As the ratings and analysis are opinions of CI they should be relied upon to a limited degree and users of this information should conduct their own risk assessment and due diligence before making any investment or other business decisions.

Copyright © Capital Intelligence Ratings Ltd 2022

MENAFN24112022002960000411ID1105228269


Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.