Author:
Jasmine Harris
(MENAFN- The Conversation) The California state legislature has approved a bill that allows college athletes to earn money through athletic endorsements starting in 2023. The governor hasn't said whether he'll sign the bill into law. Jasmine Harris, anexpert on student athletes , addresses how the bill, known as ' Fair Pay to Play Act ,' would alter college athletics if it gets signed into law. Her edited comments are below.
1. The Fair Pay to Play Act mentions preventing the exploitation of student athletes. Just how are student athletes being exploited?
College athletics has become such a business that the exploitation is happening on multiple levels. It's not just that the colleges are making money off of the student athlete.
Players are also prevented from generating any kind of compensation around their image or likeness while they're in college, which – for many of them – is going to be the only time when their likeness or their image has any economic value at all.
Right nowless than 2%of players end up going pro. And so you've got this entire industry that's built on generating revenue off the athlete through ticket sales,sponsorship dealswith apparel companies, andTV distribution deals .
But that money – instead of being allocated back to the students or making changesthat allow additional compensation to be accumulated by the students – goes to things such ascoaches' salariesand new dorms and updated locker rooms with personal barbers and locker seats thatroll out into beds .
It's enough to make me wonder whether these students are going to be sleeping in the locker rooms because they're spending so much time in the stadium as opposed to in their own dorms or classrooms.
2. Why do student athletes need compensation on top of their scholarships?
People expect non-student athletes to have a job or two. Studies have found that athletes spend32 to 44 hoursa week on their respective sports, which is in line withmy own research , which shows that they spend three times as much time on their athletic responsibilities than they do on their student responsibilities.
So this idea that a scholarship – which is just tuition, fees, books, room and board – is enough, suggests that that's enough for all college students and it's not. And in fact it's becoming increasingly likely that students across the board, in terms of socioeconomic class, are having toget additional jobsto make more money or theirparents are having to put in more moneyon a day-to-day basis for them to live.
3. The bill, if enacted, wouldn't take effect until 2023. Why so long?
I think the California legislature is hoping that the NCAA will see this and try to institute some of its own policy changes that are more in line with the way that this bill is written. The 2023 deadline for instituting this law is about providing a cushion to allow the NCAA time to adequately adjust its current bylaws to be more in line with this new legislation.
Universities
Higher education
US higher education
College athletes
Colleges
US universities
College athletics
Questions answered
NCAA
College sports
U.S. Colleges
higher ed attainment
MENAFN2009201901990000ID1099029752
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.