(MENAFN- The Conversation) A worldwide wave of school climate strikes, begun by the remarkableGreta Thunberg , hasreached the UK . Some critics claim these activist-pupils are simplyplaying truant , but I disagree. Speaking as both a climate campaigner and anacademic philosopher , I believe school walkouts are morally and politically justifiable.
Philosophy can help us tackle the question of whether direct action is warranted via thetheory of civil disobedience . This states that, in a democratic society, one is justified in disobeying the law only when other alternatives have been exhausted, and the injustice being protested against is grave.
In the case of the climate school strikes, it is without question that the injustice – the threat – is grave. There is none graver facing us.
It appears reasonable to claim furthermore that other alternatives have indeed been exhausted. After all, people have been trying to wake governments up to the climate threat for decades now, and we are still as a society way off the pace set out even by a conservative organisation such as the IPCC.
But if that claim was strongly contested, and it was suggested that climate activism should continue to focus on conventional electoral politics, then attention might revert to the assumed premise that society is democratic. Do people in Britain and elsewhere really live in 'democracies', given (for instance) the vastly greater power of the rich, and of owners of media, to influence elections, compared to everyone else?
A school strike in Melbourne, Australia.
Julian Meehan / School Strike ,CC BY-SA
I don't want to adjudicate whether we really live in a democracy. But what of course makes this a particularly salient question for school strikes is the simple fact that in any casechildren have no voice in this democratic system . And yet the climate crisis and the perhaps equally catastrophicbiodiversity crisiswill affect children much more than adults.
Our 'democratic' system seems to have a built in present-centricness, and a weakness in relation to issues of long-term significance, that seriously undermines its claims to democratic legitimacy. Thus philosophers have sometimes argued, beginning withEdmund Burkein the 18th century, that to make the system truly democratic we would need to somehow include – and give real power to – the voices of the past and the future in that system. Most especially, for they are at risk of suffering the worst: the voices of children and indeed of unborn future generations.
Read more:
Why don't teenagers have a greater say in their future?
So, a forceful argument could be made that it must be legitimate for children to take part in climate actions, for they do not even have recourse to the democratic channels (such as they are) that adults take for granted. This is especially true once we add that it seems reasonable for children to object to schooling that may well be rendered irrelevant by a climate-induced catastrophe. For example, much of the way thateconomics , business studies and IT are taught presupposes a world that will probably soon cease to exist.
Adults have failed
If you are convinced by this, then all well and good. However, at this point, I want to pull the rug slightly from under the argument that I've made so far. I put it to you that, if you are an adult, as I am, then your view in any case is somewhat beside the point.
Let down by adults? Young protesters at the recent UN climate talks in Poland.
Andrzej Grygiel / EPA
For the brutal fact is that, try hard though some of us have done, we adults havecategorically failed our children . This is a grievous wrong, perhaps the worst thing that mammals, primates, such as ourselves, can do: to have let down those who we claim to love more than life itself. We have set our children on a path to a 'future' in whichsociety as we know it may have collapsed . And even if we accomplish an unprecedented societal transformation over the next decade, themassive time-lagsbuilt into the climate system mean things will still get worse for a long time to come.
And so on this occasion we adults ought to humbly realise that it is no longer for us to tell our children what to do. We ought rather to take up the role of supporting them in their uprising, asking how we can help them in their struggle for survival. They are inspiring us, now.
The ultimate reason why we should support these school strikes, as I and hundreds of other UK academicshave just declared we will do , is that, through our inaction that has led the world they will inherit to this pretty pass, we adults have forfeited the moral right to do anything else.
Click here to subscribe to our climate action newsletter. Climate change is inevitable. Our response to it isn't.
Climate change
Philosophy
Moral philosophy
Civil disobedience
School strikes
Climate strikes
School climate strikes
MENAFN2008201901990000ID1098905661
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.