(MENAFN- iCrowdNewsWire) The Complaint alleges Civil RICO Defendants Clive Jackson, Bernardus Vorster, Dan Northover and John Doe (s) conspired to participate in and conduct affairs of a RICO ENTERPRISE through a pattern of racketeering activity. This activity included illicit transfers to defunct corporations owned by the Civil RICO Defendants in the form of "consulting fees" activity not disclosed to investors with money which otherwise belonged to Plaintiff. "To this point, Defendants have been aggressively attempting to dodge process servers in London," says lead Attorney Jay Farrow.
The criminal enterprise of this case involves numerous acts of fraud, deceit, manipulation and the destruction of Plaintiff and Plaintiff's property. According to the highly detailed lawsuit, the RICO Defendants are professional money launderers who purposely conceived, developed and prosecuted a scheme to defraud Plaintiff out of tens of millions of dollars of revenue remuneration.
Alleged Activities:
- Monies and illicit gains were used by the RICO Defendants to "pump up" the health and value of Defendant Fly Victor to lure unsuspecting investors to infuse funding.
- RICO Defendants then funneled money out of Defendant Fly Victor into a spider web of international corporate entities, which they are the exclusive directors and corporate officers.
- In the process of these and other racketeering activities, RICO Defendants may have engaged in "Unfair and Deceptive Practices", which could negatively impact Plaintiff's assets and their ability to generate future revenue.
Regulatory expert and attorney for the Zuckert, Scoutt & Rasenberger (a Washington D.C. Law Firm) Jol Silversmithstated, "The DOT may impose a civil penalty of more than $32,000 both per violation and per day for these DOT violations. No matter how calculated, the potential maximum penalty is both serious and significant accounting to millions of dollars in penalties."
"Our team of private investigators continue to uncover illicit activities by the RICO Defendants and in addition to possible tax evasion and bank fraud charges, we have begun investigating Class Action claims as outlined in the complaint by Attorney Jol Silversmith," said Jay Farrow of the Farrow Law Firm. "These RICO Defendants need to be held accountable for their nefarious actions."
About Farrow Law FirmFarrow Law Firm represents individuals and commercial businesses, in 2 states: Florida and New York. Attorney Jay Farrow and his associates have appeared in diverse cases and have delivered extraordinary results time and time again through their relentless commitment to success. Farrow Law Firm supports its clients to find their voice and stand up to the bullies in their life. Most of their cases involve the civil prosecution for otherwise criminal behavior and the proverbial David v. Goliath showdown.
Also Read:
•Grant & Eisenhofer Brings Mass Tort Lawsuits against Drugmaker Gilead over HIV Medications Containing TDF, Suits Move Forward in California State Court
•News from LTC4 - THE industry standard for tech competence
•Sibley Challenges New York State's Handgun Law and Licensing Procedures in Federal Court
•Medical Malpractice Claim Amended in State Case Against Columbus Regional Healthcare
•Department of Transportation backtracks on legal obligation to take action addressing airplane restroom accessibility for travelers with disabilities
Contact Information:(Contact: Janine Davis,[email protected] , 954-252-9818)
MENAFN0708201900703403ID1098858091
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.