Regional cities beware fast rail might lead to disadvantaged dormitories, not booming economies


Author: Jago Dodson

(MENAFN- The Conversation) Governments are looking to fast rail services to regional cities to relieve population pressures in Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane. The federal government is fundingnine business casesfor such schemes. But what economic effect might these fast links have on the regional cities?

The current fast rail schemes seem oriented at relieving population pressures in the major cities rather than a productive regional economic purpose. The minister for population, cities and urban infrastructure recentlystated :


Read more:
We can halve train travel times between our cities by moving to faster rail

The argument seems built on a pitch to city workers priced out of metropolitan housing markets. It treats regional towns as remote dormitories for metropolitan workers rather than as regional cities that serve as service hubs and employment centres. But will subsidising metropolitan workers to live in cheaper regional towns have a positive economic effect on those towns?


An unequal relationship

Concern is growing among international observers thatfast rail connections between two cities benefit the larger of the pair . ProfessorMichael Storper observed :

While Paris is seen as benefiting the most from the national fast rail TGV service, the regional cities ofLyon and Lille have strengthened their economic positions . The Lyon and Lille fast rail stations form the hub of their respective regional transport networks and have attracted new commercial activity. They also sit at intersections of major European fast rail networks.

It's a pattern that cannot be easily achieved for Australia's regional cities due to our widely dispersed settlements. So what does this mean for our regional cities?

Improving transport infrastructure doesn't just improve regional business access to metropolitan markets. It decrease the costs of trade in both directions. And large cities are typically more productive economically. This is because they offer more specialised goods and services and can leverage the agglomeration effects of shared high-quality labour markets and infrastructure, plus a concentration of skills and knowledge.


Read more:
Our big cities are engines of inequality, so how do we fix that?

Reduced travel times can mean regional businesses become less efficient than metropolitan competitors that can offer a wider range of specialist goods and services. This may lead toregional business closures, employment losses and wage decline. Unless a regional city is able to develop a specialised set of high-skill, high-wage industries that complement or outcompete the metropolis it risks being economically disadvantaged by faster rail.

New regional demand arising from commuter population growth might counter the loss of higher-order regional jobs due to improved transport links. But that will largely be in lower-value retail and personal service sectors. The result will still be a net economic gain for the metropolis.


Read more:
The growing skills gap between jobs in Australian cities and the regions

An influx of commuters earning metropolitan wages might alsoinflate regional housing markets . This would disadvantage lower-paid regional workers. The beneficiaries of this scenario are likely to be local rentiers, such as landholders and developers who can profit from land-price inflation.

This interest group will likely vocally promote regional fast rail. But sustainable economic prosperity for regional cities requires more than population-driven land speculation.


Read more:
A housing affordability crisis in regional Australia? Yes, and here's why


The example of Geelong

The most advanced of the current Australian proposals is theGeelong-Melbourne route . It has received federal and statefunding for planningwith an estimated total cost ofat least A$10 billion .But planners need to ask how this spending will provide a net economic benefit, and how the benefits will be distributed.

Growth in commuter population and the services this attracts may be seem like a resolution to metropolitan population problems, but could further concentrate higher-paid jobs in Melbourne. Faster commutes mean Melbourne-based firms will have a greater pick of Geelong-based workers, thus consolidating metropolitan competitive advantage. Fast rail thus risks placing Geelong at a competitive disadvantage, with jobs and workers being exported to Melbourne.

Meanwhile the pressure of housing another145,000 residents in the next 20 yearsalready falls on Geelong, acity of 280,000 people . The strain on infrastructure and services is proportionately greater than would be the case in Melbourne, which hasnearly 5 millionresidents.


Read more:
This is how regional rail can help ease our big cities' commuter crush


What can policymakers do about this?

To resolve this conundrum, thought must be given to what specialised high-value jobs will be attracted to regional cities to accompany fast rail investments, so these cities remain competitive and productive, regionally, nationally and internationally. This might include policies such as relocating public agencies, regional targeting of university-based research and development spending, boosting services such as schools and hospitals, and providing incentives for innovative private companies to relocate to regional towns.

Policymakers should also consider positioning regional cities as rail network hubs in their own right. An example would be connecting Geelong, Ballarat and Bendigo by rail, along with better linkages to national and international airports.

We don't yet know for sure what the effects of fast rail on regional cities will be. But the impact of this infrastructure needs to be assessed very carefully lest it turns Australia's regional cities into dependent population dormitories rather than regional dynamos, at vast public expense.



    Housing prices
    Rail
    High speed rail
    Affordable housing
    rail transport
    housing affordability
    Commuting
    regional cities


MENAFN1507201901990000ID1098761320


Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.